Close Menu
  • Home
  • Vaccines
  • Politics
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Sports
  • Research
  • Fitness
  • Careers
What's Hot

Health Canada approves Novartis’ KISQALI® for HR+/HER2- early breast cancer patients at high risk of recurrence

Sheriff, county lawyer seeking mental health funds at Minnesota State Capitol

Chronic absences have not disappeared. Research shows that poor children are most hurt.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
subjectional.com
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Vaccines
  • Politics
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Sports
  • Research
  • Fitness
  • Careers
subjectional.com
Home » Model of driving factors for success in public health project management using structural equation modeling
Featured Health

Model of driving factors for success in public health project management using structural equation modeling

Paul E.By Paul E.October 20, 2024No Comments15 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Turnock, B. Public Health: What It Is and How It Works 5th edn (Jones & Bartlett, 2012).

Anomaly, J. What is public health? Public goods, publicized goods, and the conversion problem. Public. Choice, (2021).

Cruz, M. P. et al. COVID-19, a worldwide public health emergency. Revista Clínica Española. 221 (1), 55–61 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Brownson, R. C. et al. Reimagining Public Health in the Aftermath of a pandemic. Am. J. Public Health. 110 (11), 1605–1610 (2020).

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Benjamin, G. C. What is Public Health? Telling our own story. Am. J. Public Health. 112 (4), 613–614 (2022).

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Kickbusch, I. The contribution of the World Health Organization to a New Public Health and Health Promotion. Am. J. Public Health. 93 (3), 383–388 (2003).

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Turner, J. The Handbook of Project-based Management: Leading Strategic Change in Organizations 3th edn (McGraw-Hill Education, 2009).

WHO. Essential public health functions, health systems and health security: Developing conceptual clarity and a WHO roadmap for action. (2018).

CCDF. CDC Foundation. (2024). https://www.cdcfoundation.org

EC EU Health Programme: Project Management in Public Health in Europe (Publications Office, 2011).

Ika, L. A. Opening the black box of project management: does World Bank project supervision influence project impact? Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (5), 1111–1123 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Ika, L. A. & Donnelly, J. Success conditions for international development capacity building projects. Int. J. Project Manage. 35 (1), 44–63 (2017).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Pinto, J. K. & Mantel, S. J. The causes of project failure. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 37 (4), 269–276 (1990).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Trigo, A. & Varajão., J. IT Project Management Critical Success Factors. in International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications. Cagliari, Italy: Springer International Publishing. (2020).

Santos, C. et al. Project Management in Public Health: a systematic literature review on Success Criteria and factors. Portuguese J. Public. Health. 38 (1), 37–48 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Baier, M. S. et al. Success factors of process digitalization projects—insights from an exploratory study. Bus. Process. Manage. J. 28 (2), 325–347 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Venczel, T. B., Berényi, L. & Hriczó, K. Project Management Success Factors. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1935(2021): pp. 1–9. (2021).

Tsoy, M. & Staples, D. S. What are the critical success factors for Agile Analytics projects? Inform. Syst. Manage. 38 (4), 324–341 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Iriarte, C. & Bayona, S. IT projects success factors: a literature review. Int. J. Inform. Syst. Project Manage. 8 (2), 49–78 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Radujković, M. & Sjekavica, M. Project management success factors. in Creative Construction Conference. Primosten, Croatia. (2017).

Moura, I., Dominguez, C. & Varajão, J. Information systems project team members: factors for high performance. TQM J. 33 (6), 1426–1446 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Tam, C. et al. The factors influencing the success of on-going agile software development projects. Int. J. Project Manage. 38 (3), 165–176 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Santos, C. et al. Project management success in health—the need of additional research in public health projects. Procedia Technol. 16 (2014), 1080–1085 (2014).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Takagi, N. & Varajão, J. ISO 21500 and success management: an integrated model for project management. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage. 39 (2), 408–427 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Varajão, J. et al. Success Management—from theory to practice. Int. J. Project Manage. 40 (5), 481–498 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Varajão, J. A new process for success management bringing order to a typically ad-hoc area. J. Mod. Project Manage. 5 (3), 92–99 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Takagi, N. & Varajão, J. Success Management and Scrum for IS Projects – An Integrated Approach. in Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. Association for Information Systems. (2021).

Edelman, C. & Kudzma, E. C. Health Promotion throughout the Life Span 10th edn (Elsevier Health Sciences, 2021).

Cappellaro, G., Compagni, A. & Dacin, M. T. Trajectories of Value Generation and capturing by public–private hybrids: mechanisms of multi-level governance in healthcare. Organ. Stud., : pp. 1–27. (2023).

Rhodes, P. public health. (cited 2023 01/06/2023); (2022). https://www.britannica.com/topic/public-health

Moberg, J. et al. The GRADE evidence to decision (EtD) framework for health system and public health decisions. Health Res. Policy Syst. 16 (1), 1–15 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Gunasekeran, D. V. et al. Applications of digital health for public health responses to COVID-19: a systematic scoping review of artificial intelligence, telehealth and related technologies. Npj Digit. Med. 4 (1), 40 (2021).

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Dubé, È. et al. Vaccine hesitancy, acceptance, and anti-vaccination: trends and future prospects for public health. Annu. Rev. Public Health. 42 (1), 175–191 (2021).

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Paul, E., Steptoe, A. & Fancourt, D. Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: implications for public health communications. Lancet Reg. Health – Europe. 1 (2021), 1–10 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Benham, J. L. et al. Attitudes, current behaviours and barriers to public health measures that reduce COVID-19 transmission: a qualitative study to inform public health messaging. PloS One. 16 (2), 1–14 (2021).

Article 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar 

Papke-Shields, K. E., Beise, C. & Quan, J. Do project managers practice what they preach, and does it matter to project success? Int. J. Project Manage. 28 (7), 650–662 (2010).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Turner, J. & Xue, Y. On the success of megaprojects. Int. J. Managing Projects Bus. 11 (3), 783–805 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar 

de Wit, A. Measurement of project success. Int. J. Project Manage. 6 (3), 164–170 (1988).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Ngereja, B. J., Hussein, B. & Wolff, C. A comparison of soft factors in the implementation and adoption of digitalization projects: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Inform. Syst. Project Manage. 12 (2), 70–86 (2024).

Google Scholar 

Shore, B. Systematic biases and culture in Project failures. Project Manage. J. 39 (4), 5–16 (2008).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Shirley, D. Project Management for Healthcare 2nd edn (CRC, 2020).

Belout, A. & Gauvreau, C. Factors influencing project success: the impact of human resource management. Int. J. Project Manage. 22 (1), 1–11 (2004).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Mir, F. A. & Pinnington, A. H. Exploring the value of project management: linking Project Management Performance and Project Success. Int. J. Project Manage. 32 (2), 202–217 (2014).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Saleem, F. et al. Public Health and Project Management: do projects deliver? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 17 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197244 (2020).

Milat, A. J., Bauman, A. & Redman, S. Narrative review of models and success factors for scaling up public health interventions. Implement. Sci. 10 (1), 1–11 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Barros, L., Tam, C. & Varajão, J. Agile software development projects–Unveiling the human-related critical success factors. Information and Software Technology, 170(2024): pp. 1–12. (2024).

Cserháti, G. & Szabó, L. The relationship between success criteria and success factors in organisational event projects. Int. J. Project Manage. 32 (4), 613–624 (2014).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Takagi, N. & Varajão, J. Integration of success management into project management guides and methodologies – position paper. Procedia Computer Science, 164(2019): pp. 366–372. (2019).

Takagi, N. et al. Managing success criteria and success factors in a BPM project: an approach using PRINCE2 and Success Management on the public sector. Cogent Bus. Manage. 11 (1), 1–20 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Lim, C. S. & Mohamed, M. Z. Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination. Int. J. Project Manage. 17 (4), 243–248 (1999).

Article 

Google Scholar 

IPMA, Individual Competence Baseline for Project, Programme and Portfolio Management. 4th ed. Amrsterdam, Netherlands: International Project Management Association. (2015).

Pereira, J., Varajão, J. & Takagi, N. Evaluation of Information Systems Project success – insights from practitioners. Inform. Syst. Manage. 39 (2), 138–155 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Shenhar, A. et al. Project Success: a Multidimensional Strategic Concept. Long Range Plann. 34 (6), 699–725 (2001).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Baccarini, D. The logical framework method for defining project success. Project Manage. J. 30 (4), 25–32 (1999).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Dille, T., Hernes, T. & Vaagaasar, A. L. Stuck in temporal translation? Challenges of discrepant temporal structures in interorganizational project collaboration. Organ. Stud. 44 (6), 867–888 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Berg, H. & Ritschel, J. D. The characteristics of successful military IT projects: A cross-country empirical study. Int. J. Inform. Syst. Project Manage. 11 (2), 25–44 (2023).

Google Scholar 

Andersen, E. S. Do project managers have different perspectives on project management? Int. J. Project Manage. 34 (1), 58–65 (2016).

Article 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar 

Andersen, E. S. Value creation using the mission breakdown structure. Int. J. Project Manage. 32 (5), 885–892 (2014).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Westerveld, E. The project excellence model: Linking success criteria and critical success factors. Int. J. Project Manage. 21 (6), 411–418 (2003).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Bryde, D. J. Modelling project management performance. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage. 20 (2), 229–254 (2003).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Qureshi, T. M., Warraich, A. S. & Hijazi, S. T. Significance of project management performance assessment (PMPA) model. Int. J. Project Manage. 27 (4), 378–388 (2009).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Winter, M. & Szczepanek, T. Projects and programmes as value creation processes: A new perspective and some practical implications. Int. J. Project Manage. 26 (1), 95–103 (2008).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Berssaneti, F. T. & Carvalho, M. M. Identification of variables that impact project success in Brazilian companies. Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (3), 638–649 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Davis, K. An empirical investigation into different stakeholder groups perception of project success. Int. J. Project Manage. 35 (4), 604–617 (2017).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Williams, P. et al. Relationship quality and satisfaction: Customer-perceived success factors for on-time projects. Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (8), 1836–1850 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Serrador, P. & Pinto, J. K. Does agile work?—A quantitative analysis of agile project success. Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (5), 1040–1051 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Haverila, M. J. & Fehr, K. The impact of product superiority on customer satisfaction in project management. Int. J. Project Manage. 34 (4), 570–583 (2016).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Atkinson, R. Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. Int. J. Project Manage. 17 (6), 337–342 (1999).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Takagi, N. & Ventura, T. Artificial Intelligence Insights on Success Evaluation in Information Systems Government-to-Government Projects, in Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems. AIS: Porto, Portugal. (2024).

Nyman, H. J. & Öörni, A. Successful projects or success in project management-are projects dependent on a methodology? Int. J. Inform. Syst. Project Manage. 11 (4), 5–25 (2023).

Google Scholar 

Davis, K. Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success. Int. J. Project Manage. 32 (2), 189–201 (2014).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Cooke-Davies, T. The real success factors on projects. Int. J. Project Manage. 20 (3), 185–190 (2002).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A. & Bala, H. Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Q. 37 (1), 21–54 (2013).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Abdullah, A. A. et al. Literature mapping: a bird’s eye view on classification of factors influencing project success. Afr. J. Bus. Manage. 4 (19), 4174–4182 (2010).

Google Scholar 

Cheadle, A. et al. Involving local health departments in community health partnerships: Evaluation results from the Partnership for the public’s Health Initiative. J. Urb. Health. 85 (2), 162–177 (2008).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Dwyer, J., Stanton, P. & Thiessen, V. Project Management in Health and Community Services: Getting good Ideas to work (Allen & Unwin, 2004).

Medlin, C. A. et al. Improving the Health of Populations: Lessons of Experience, in Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries (The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, 2006).

Paré, G. & Trudel, M. C. Knowledge barriers to PACS adoption and implementation in hospitals. Int. J. Med. Informatics. 76 (1), 22–33 (2007).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Suhonen, M. & Paasivaara, L. Nurse managers’ challenges in project management. J. Nurs. Adm. Manag. 19 (8), 1028–1036 (2011).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Yazici, H. The role of project management maturity and organizational culture in perceived performance. Project Manage. J. 40 (3), 14–33 (2009).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Isensee, C. et al. The relationship between organizational culture, sustainability, and digitalization in SMEs: A systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 275 (2020), 1–19 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Diallo, A. & Thuillier, D. The success dimensions of international development projects: The perceptions of African project coordinators. Int. J. Project Manage. 22 (1), 19–31 (2004).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Glaser, J. Management’s role in IT project failures, in Healthcare Financial Management. pp. 90–92. (2004).

Khang, D. B. & Moe, T. L. Success Criteria and factors for International Development projects: A life-cycle-based Framework. Project Manage. J. 39 (1), 72–84 (2008).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Ackermann, F. & Eden, C. Strategic Management of stakeholders: Theory and practice. Long Range Plann. 44 (3), 179–196 (2011).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Dvir, D., Raz, T. & Shenhar, A. An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success. Int. J. Project Manage. 21 (2), 89–95 (2003).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Tempfer, C. B. & Nowak, P. Consumer participation and organizational development in health care: A systematic review. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 123 (13), 408–414 (2011).

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Irfan, M. et al. Role of project planning and project manager competencies on public sector project success. Sustainability. 13 (3), 1421 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Payne, J. M. et al. Researchers’ experience with project management in health and medical research: Results from a post-project review. BMC Public. Health. 11 (424), 1–11 (2011).

Google Scholar 

Snowden, D. Complex acts of knowing: Paradox and descriptive self-awareness. J. Knowl. Manage. 6 (2), 100–111 (2002).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Sampedro, F. et al. Developing a risk management framework to improve public health outcomes by enumerating Salmonella in ground Turkey – RETRACTION. Epidemiol. Infect. 147 (e69), 1–8 (2019).

Google Scholar 

PMI. Process Groups: A Practical Guide (Project Management Institute, 2022).

Wei, C. C., Liu, P. H. & Tsai, Y. C. Resource-constrained project management using enhanced theory of constraint. Int. J. Project Manage. 20 (7), 561–567 (2002).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Crawford, P. & Bryce, P. Project monitoring and evaluation: a method for enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of aid project implementation. Int. J. Project Manage. 21 (5), 363–373 (2003).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Zulch, B. G. Communication: The Foundation of Project Management. Procedia Technol. 16 (2014), 1000–1009 (2014).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Söderlund, J. Pluralism in Project Management: Navigating the crossroads of specialization and fragmentation. Int. J. Manage. Reviews. 13 (2), 153–176 (2011).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Chen, H. L. & Lin, Y. L. Goal orientations, leader-leader exchange, trust, and the outcomes of project performance. Int. J. Project Manage. 36 (5), 716–729 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Buvik, M. P. & Rolfsen, M. Prior ties and trust development in project teams—a case study from the construction industry. Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (7), 1484–1494 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Tansley, C. & Newell, S. Project social capital, leadership and trust: A study of human resource information systems development. J. Managerial Psychol. 22 (4), 350–368 (2007).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Edward, J., Kinlaw, C. S. & Kinlaw, D. C. Developing superior project teams: a study of the characteristics of high performance in project teams. in PMI Research Conference. Paris, France: Project Management Institute. (2000).

Paton, S., Hodgson, D. & Cicmil, S. Who am I and what am I doing here? Becoming and being a project manager. J. Manage. Dev. 29 (2), 157–166 (2010).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Takagi, N. et al. Implementing Success Management and PRINCE2 in a BPM Public Project. in Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS). Sydney, Australia: Association for Information Systems. (2021).

Marnewick, C. A longitudinal analysis of ICT project success. in South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists Conference. Centurion, South Africa: ACM. (2012).

Müller, R. & Jugdev, K. Critical success factors in projects: Pinto, Slevin, and Prescott – the elucidation of project success. Int. J. Managing Projects Bus. 5 (4), 757–775 (2012).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Gorman, K. & Johnson, D. E. Quantitative analysis, in The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford University Press. 214–240. (2013).

Pallant, J. SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step Guide to data Analysis Using IBM SPSS 7th edn (Routledge, 2020).

Cronbach, L. J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 16 (3), 297–334 (1951).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. Psychometric Theory 3rd edn (McGraw-Hill, 1994).

Bentler, P. M. On tests and indices for evaluating structural models. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 42 (5), 825–829 (2007).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Cohen, J. A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112 (1), 155–159 (1992).

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

IPMA, Project Excellence Baseline – for Achieving Excellence in Projects and Programmes. Amrsterdam, Netherlands: International Project Management Association. (2016).

PMI A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge: (PMBOK Guide) 7th edn (Project Management Institute, 2021).

Munns, A. K. & Bjeirmi, B. F. The role of project management in achieving project success. Int. J. Project Manage. 14 (2), 81–87 (1996).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Varajão, J., Fernandes, G. & Silva, H. Most used project management tools and techniques in information systems projects. J. Syst. Inform. Technol. 12 (3), 225–242 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Engwall, M. No project is an island: linking projects to history and context. Res. Policy. 32 (5), 789–808 (2003).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Lundin, R. A. & Steinthórsson, R. S. Studying organizations as temporary. Scand. J. Manag. 19 (2), 233–250 (2003).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Johansson, S., Löfström, M. & Ohlsson, Ö. Separation or integration? A dilemma when organizing development projects. Int. J. Project Manage. 25 (5), 457–464 (2007).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Grabher, G. The Project Ecology of Advertising: Tasks, talents and teams. Reg. Stud. 36 (3), 245–262 (2002).

Article 

Google Scholar 

White, D. & Fortune, J. Current practice in project management—an empirical study. Int. J. Project Manage. 20 (1), 1–11 (2002).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Diallo, A. & Thuillier, D. The success of international development projects, trust and communication: An African perspective. Int. J. Project Manage. 23 (3), 237–252 (2005).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Wang, X. & Huang, J. The relationships between key stakeholders’ project performance and project success: perceptions of Chinese construction supervising engineers. Int. J. Project Manage. 24 (3), 253–260 (2006).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Hyväri, I. Success of projects in different organizational conditions. Project Manage. J. 37 (4), 31–41 (2006).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Varajão, J. & Trigo, A. Assessing IT Project success – perception vs. Reality (ACM Queue, 2024).

Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. Using Multivariate Statistics 7th edn (Pearson, 2019).



Source link

Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
Previous ArticleScientists announce breakthrough in effort to bring back extinct Tasmanian tiger
Next Article As new strains of COVID-19 emerge, how are vaccine makers responding to virus mutations?
Paul E.
  • Website

Related Posts

Health Canada approves Novartis’ KISQALI® for HR+/HER2- early breast cancer patients at high risk of recurrence

June 18, 2025

Sheriff, county lawyer seeking mental health funds at Minnesota State Capitol

June 5, 2025

Better Choice Company announces SRX Health closure

April 25, 2025
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Latest Posts

Health Canada approves Novartis’ KISQALI® for HR+/HER2- early breast cancer patients at high risk of recurrence

Sheriff, county lawyer seeking mental health funds at Minnesota State Capitol

Chronic absences have not disappeared. Research shows that poor children are most hurt.

Transport Secretary reveals overhaul of aging pneumatic transport systems

Latest Posts

Subscribe to News

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

Welcome to Subjectional!

At Subjectional, we believe that informed opinions are the foundation of a vibrant society. Our mission is to provide insightful, engaging, and balanced information across a diverse range of topics that matter to you. Whether you’re interested in the latest developments in health, navigating the complexities of politics, staying updated on sports, exploring technological advancements, or advancing your career, we’ve got you covered.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2025 subjectional. Designed by subjectional.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.