Close Menu
  • Home
  • Vaccines
  • Politics
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Sports
  • Research
  • Fitness
  • Careers
What's Hot

Edge Sound Research Closes New Salary Increases Including USTA, Devos Family

Health Canada approves Novartis’ KISQALI® for HR+/HER2- early breast cancer patients at high risk of recurrence

Sheriff, county lawyer seeking mental health funds at Minnesota State Capitol

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
subjectional.com
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Vaccines
  • Politics
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Sports
  • Research
  • Fitness
  • Careers
subjectional.com
Home » Are tech billionaires taking over our future? This Nobel Prize winner warns of Big Tech’s stranglehold on AI and democracy
Featured Tech

Are tech billionaires taking over our future? This Nobel Prize winner warns of Big Tech’s stranglehold on AI and democracy

Paul E.By Paul E.October 25, 2024No Comments4 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Should our future be decided by the executives of big technology companies? For Nobel Prize winner Simon Johnson, giving too much power to a few billionaires comes at the expense of the public interest.

The British-American economist who teaches at MIT also emphasized that the development of artificial intelligence (AI) should benefit less qualified workers.

Automation and its impact on jobs is one of Mr Johnson’s favorite elements in the relationship between democracy and economic prosperity, and is one of Johnson’s favorite aspects of the relationship between democracy and economic prosperity, along with Turkish-American economist Daron Acemoglu and British-American James Robinson. This is the theme for which he and I won the Nobel Prize.

AFP spoke to Johnson by phone and the interview has been edited for length.

Q. Your research looks at the relationship between democratic institutions and economic development, and many Western countries feel they are missing out on growth and are turning to populist movements. How do you explain this?

I was actually in France during the recent elections…I’m no expert on France, but from those conversations and my first-hand observations, even in the wealthier areas of France…people were disappointed and It sounds like you are dissatisfied. I feel that democracy is not being realized…

So not being able to deliver results to people is a problem, and of course we have to deal with it, and we have to deal with it by producing better work, and that’s what all It’s the basic foundation. Jobs that are more productive, pay better, have better working and living conditions than they had before, or even better than their parents…and if a system that makes reasonable promises about such things fails. Then. Yes, I think we should be prepared for some disappointment and some backlash in order to deliver.

Will AI increase productivity and wages for low-skilled workers, or will it become a vehicle for so-called over-automation, essentially firing workers from grocery stores and replacing them with self-checkout kiosks?

Q. Who would benefit from AI in that case? Better educated workers?

Let’s be honest… AI primarily benefits big tech companies. In moments like these, the people who envision the technology and the vision that shapes it are critical. And of course, these people are considered heroes at this time. But I think we have to ask ourselves. Should we put so much power in the hands of one, two, three, or a few people?

Don’t let the big tech gurus control what gets developed, how it’s used and how it impacts work…you’ll understand their vision of the future . And not for you, not for your people, not for your community, but for their wealth…

Q. Do we need more regulation of Big Tech?

The business models of Meta (Facebook and Instagram) and Alphabet (Google) and several others are driven by digital advertising. The way digital advertising works is to grab your attention, sway you, and manipulate your emotions. By the way, this is bad for mental health, it’s very bad for children, and it’s terrible for democracy. Because what they want is for you to get really worked up and get mad at other people, yell at them, and do things like… no one would act in public. Therefore, you need to realize that digital advertising is like cigarettes or junk food.

I’m not suggesting banning it, and I don’t think it would work, but it should be heavily taxed. In any case, our proposal (with Daron Acemoglu) would impose a fairly high tax on digital advertising, which would generate approximately $200 billion in additional revenue for the United States, which is a significant amount. So…we propose the following. Congress could put some of this tax money toward mental health, including children’s mental health.

And in any case, encouraging these companies to change their business models and reduce their reliance on digital advertising would be good for many people in many ways, including in terms of democracy… We have to de-escalate, we have to go back to finding common ground to eliminate polarization.

Recommended newsletters
Data Sheet: Stay on top of the latest in the business of technology with thoughtful analysis of the industry’s biggest companies.
Sign up here.



Source link

Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
Previous ArticleMedia Research Center awards first annual Freedom of Speech Award to Senator Cruz
Next Article CDC lowers age range for pneumococcal vaccine, shares latest coronavirus vaccine guidelines
Paul E.
  • Website

Related Posts

Tamarack Global Closes $72 Million Opportunity II Fund to Advance Deep Technology and Industrial Innovation

October 31, 2024

Inside Super Micro’s wake-up call: After riding the AI wave, the $20 billion tech giant is crashing back to earth amid a financial crisis and family drama

October 31, 2024

Northern Hockey and Tech Hockey open CCHA season with rivalry series

October 31, 2024
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Latest Posts

Edge Sound Research Closes New Salary Increases Including USTA, Devos Family

Health Canada approves Novartis’ KISQALI® for HR+/HER2- early breast cancer patients at high risk of recurrence

Sheriff, county lawyer seeking mental health funds at Minnesota State Capitol

Chronic absences have not disappeared. Research shows that poor children are most hurt.

Latest Posts

Subscribe to News

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

Welcome to Subjectional!

At Subjectional, we believe that informed opinions are the foundation of a vibrant society. Our mission is to provide insightful, engaging, and balanced information across a diverse range of topics that matter to you. Whether you’re interested in the latest developments in health, navigating the complexities of politics, staying updated on sports, exploring technological advancements, or advancing your career, we’ve got you covered.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2025 subjectional. Designed by subjectional.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.